Black Lives Matter

We have read in the Classic Slave Narratives the lives of Frederick Douglass and Harriet Jacobs. These narratives form an important part of African-American identity formation as well as demonstrate the considerable adversity past African-Americans have experienced. The shadow of slavery and the dehumanization it required for its continued practice reaches to the modern day. In the treatment of black citizens by the police, we continue to see an ideology at work that maintains the subaltern status of black Americans to the detriment of black lives and the benefit of a longstanding dominant white Anglo-Saxon Protestant narrative. No matter how hard a black American citizen strives to fit into the mold of this dominant narrative, they will never achieve it for the system requires a subject class in order to maintain itself. To borrow from Kirsten West Savali who is quoting Malcom X in her essay ‘I Go To UVA,’ Martese Johnson’s Cry of Millennial Disbelief, “What do you call an educated negro with a B.A. or an M.A., with a B.S., or a PhD? You call him a nigger, because that is what the white man calls him, a nigger.” It is for this reason that when a person, generally white, argues “all lives matter” in response to the “black lives matter” slogan, they miss the fundamental point of the black lives matter slogan.

The point of the black lives matter slogan is to illustrate the considerable discrepancies in the treatment of black American citizens by entities that are suppose to “protect and serve” such as the police, or that are “of the people, by the people, and for the people” in the case of the government. Solely because of skin color, the black citizen sits at the bottom of the American sociopolitical and economical pyramid. How else can we explain the indignities listed by Savali in her essay Supporting Only ‘Good’ Black Victims Won’t Dismantle White Supremacy? Consider the following excerpt from her essay:

It applied to Vassar College professor and Mississippi writer Kiese Laymon and the many instances of racial bias he detailed in a brilliant and brave essay, “My Vassar College Faculty ID Makes Everything OK.”

It applied to the group of black Harvard and Yale alum who were mistaken for gangbangers and barred from their own party because they were attracting too many black people.

It applied to The Root’s co-founder, Harvard Professor Henry Louis “Skip” Gates Jr. when he was arrested in his own home on suspicion of breaking and entering.

As Savali shows us, no amount of behaving as the dominant white narrative says to behave will avail the black citizen from the abuses of an oppressive ideology embedded within our society. If you look upon the wall of the Fletcher Library where students are encouraged to write upon a large piece of paper discussing Ferguson and similar events, you will see critics stating “I support law enforcement” or “Actions have consequences”, or an earlier student’s “black lives matter” altered to “All lives matter” with “this is the problem” criticizing the emphasis on black lives underneath. What these critics seem to not understand is that black citizens do not count in the dominant narrative. If all lives really mattered, black citizens would receive the fair treatment they are due as human being as well as enjoy the privileges their white counterparts have long possessed.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Citizenship, Democracy, Douglass, Jacobs, Law and Difference and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Black Lives Matter

  1. kiracanderson says:

    This is a great post! I am aghast that someone altered the “black lives matter” to “all lives matter”, then blamed the original slogan for being divisive. I’ve always had a problem with the co-opting of the hashtag to #alllivesmatter, but couldn’t quite put it into words until I attended a White Privilege workship last week with the Arizona Community Action Association. When we change it to All, we are entirely negating the movement. Black lives matter is not to put black lives above other people. It is in response to a widespread epidemic of police brutality and the strong undercurrent of racism in the nation. By co-opting this phrase, people are telling the black community that they are not allowed to come together and mourn, they are not allowed to draw attention to injustices, they are not allowed to acknowledge race, even though it is that very characteristic that puts their lives in danger.

  2. anapuri11 says:

    This is an amazing post! Thank you for outlining this movement so well and with such ease. It was great to read and it really tied in what we discussed in class as well as politics today. This showcases the importance of using the phrase: Black Lives Matter, rather than All Lives Matter. By saying All, this shows Black Americans that they cannot even be the main focus in the social movement that they began. The mistreatment of Black Americans is drastically larger than the mistreatment of White Americans. Most notably, if you look at the prison industrial complex and the NAACP’s Criminal Justice Fact Sheet you will see the amount of incarceration of black males and how much larger it is than white Americans.
    http://www.naacp.org/pages/criminal-justice-fact-sheet

  3. sbain2016 says:

    This is a good post, I too enjoyed your explanation of the delegitimatizing effects of using the all lives matter slogan. Police brutality and overuse of force is such a deep problem in the United States, especially in cities with large clusters of black populations with huge income disparity. In Minority Group Politics class we studied the conditions in poor neighborhoods with high crime rates, such as Milwaukee Wisconsin. Police in these areas have become jaded, and numb in an almost dehumanizing way. The constant violence and adversarial relation ship between the police and members of the community create us versus them identities in the officers and the citizens. This problem is perpetual, in that it only creates more violence and stress. Black Lives matter faces more than awareness surrounding police brutality, they are up against structural social problems of income inequality, housing segregation, poor education and structural racism.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s